Editorial standards
Useful enough to trust, honest enough to challenge
AI-work platforms change quickly and community advice is often contradictory. These rules govern how GigAgora separates verified facts, contributor experience, preparation advice and commercial material.
Last reviewed 1 August 2026
Source hierarchy
Official platform policies, help documentation and role listings come first. Dated first-hand reports can explain lived experience. Anonymous claims, referral pitches and copied answer dumps are not treated as evidence.
Assessment integrity
We may explain task categories, public rubrics, reasoning techniques and original practice exercises. We do not reproduce confidential prompts, identify current correct choices or help someone evade proctoring, identity or location checks.
Commercial independence
Buying a GigAgora guide does not improve a platform application behind the scenes. We do not accept payment for placement in comparisons, sell contributor accounts or claim guaranteed work.
Corrections
Material changes should be corrected visibly and promptly. A useful correction names the page, the disputed statement and a source that can be checked. Community anecdotes may be added as context without being promoted to a platform-wide rule.
AI-assisted publishing
Automation may help organize research or improve clarity, but factual claims must still be tied to checkable sources. We do not mass-publish thin pages whose only purpose is repeating a search phrase.
Safety
We remove personal data, account credentials, active assessment material, scams, referral spam and instructions for misrepresenting identity, qualifications or location.
What you will never find here
No leaked answer keys, rented accounts, location spoofing, guaranteed placements or invented testimonials. Those shortcuts put applicants at risk and make the information less useful for everyone.
See how our research process works, or use the community report controls when a post breaks these standards.